References

Battmer et al. (2004), Evaluation of Nucleus NRT based Speech Processor fitting in Children, poster presentation at the 8th international CI conference, Indianapolis 2004.
Brown, C.J., Hughes, M.L., Luk, B., Abbas, P.J., Wolaver, A. & Gervais, J. (2000) The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and the levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear and Hearing, 21, 151-163.
Cafarelli Dees et al. (2005) Normative findings of ECAP Measurements, Audiology and Neurotology 10:105-116.
Ching, T. Y. C., Psarros, C., Hill, M., Dillon, H., & Incerti, P. (2001). Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear? Ear and Hearing, 22, 365-380.
Ching, T. Y. C., Incerti, P., & Hill, M. (2004). Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears. Ear and Hearing, 25, 9-21.
Craddock et al. (2003) Comparison between NRT-based maps and behaviorally measured maps at different stimulation rates- A multicentre investigation. Cochlear Implants International, 4:161-170.
Fu, Q. J. & Shannon, R. V. (1999). Recognition of spectrally degraded and frequency-shifted vowels in acoustic and electric hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 1889-1900.
Fu, Q. J. & Shannon, R. V. (2002). Frequency mapping in cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 23, 339-348.
Hamzavi, J., Pok, S. M., Gstoettner, W. F., & Baumgartner, W. D. (2004). Speech perception with a cochlear implant used in conjunction with a hearing aid in the opposite ear. International Journal of Audiology, 43, 61-65.
Iwaki, T., Matsushiro, N., Mah, S. R., Sato, T., Yasuoka, E., Yamamoto, K. I., & Kubo, T. (2004). Comparison of speech perception between monaural and binaural hearing in cochlear implant patients. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 124, 358-362.
Laszig et al. (2007) Pilot study of remote measuring and fitting of Cochlear Implants. 6th European Congress of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Vienna, Austria, 2007.
Lineweaver et al. (2004). Patient driven map optimization using Genetic Algorithm. CI2004 conference, Indianapolis 2004, USA.
Long, C. J., Eddington, D. K., Colburn, H. S., & Rabinowitz, W. M. (2003). Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114, 1565-1574.
Muller, J., Schon, F., & Helms, J. (2002). Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+cochlear implant system. Ear and Hearing, 23, 198-206.
Nopp, P., Schleich, P., & D'Haese, P. (2004). Sound localization in bilateral users of MED-EL COMBI 40/40+cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 25, 205-214.
Plant, K & Psarros, C. (2002) Comparison of a standard and interpolation method of T- and C-level measurement, using both narrowly-spaced and widely-spaced electrodes, Cochlear White paper, Jan 2002.
Plant et al., (2004) Evaluation of streamlined programming procedures for the Nucleus 24 Contour, 2004 Cochlear Collaborative Research Report, p.28.
Ramos et al. (2003), Evaluation of initial fitting of children based on intra-operative NRT, poster presentation at CIAP 2003.
Roos et al. (2005) Parametric Map Adjustment by Recipients. Meeting of the Dutch Society for Audiology. Jan 2005, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Rosen, S., Faulkner, A., & Wilkinson, L. (1999). Perceptual adaptation by normal listeners to upward shifts of spectral information in speech and its relevance for users of cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 3629-3636.
Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F.-G., & Wygonski, J. (1998). Speech recognition with altered spectral distribution of envelope cues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 2467-2476.
Shpak et al. (2004) Objective measurements of auditory nerve recovery function in Nucleus CI24 implantees in relation to subjective preference of stimulation rate. Acta Otolaryngology, 124; 582-586.
Smoorenburg et al. (2002) Speech perception in Nucleus CI24M Cochlear Implant Users with Processor Settings based on Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Thresholds, Audiology and Neurotology, 7:335-347.
Smoorenburg, G.F. (2007) Cochlear Implant Ear Marks, Gildeprint drukkerijen B.V. ISBN-10:90-9021523-9
Tyler, R. S., Gantz, B. J., Rubinstein, J. T., Wilson, B. S., Parkinson, A. J., Wolaver, A., Preece, J. P., Witt, S., & Lowder, M. W. (2002). Three-month results with bilateral cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 23, 80S-89S.
Wasowski et al. (2007) Remote fitting of Cochlear Implant systems. 6th European Congress of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Vienna, Austria, 2007.
 
Wesarg et al. (2007) Pilot study of remote measuring and fitting of Cochlear Implants, 8th EFAS congress , Heidelberg, Germany, 2007
Wilson, B. S. (1993). Signal processing. In R.S.Tyler (Ed.), Cochlear Implants: Audiological Foundations ( San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.
Wilson, B., Finley, C., Lawson, D., Wolford, R., Eddington, D., & Rabinowitz, W. (1991). Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature, 352, 2.
Back to Cochlear Implant Fitting.